Presentation
Evaluation of spill response equipment
DescriptionAssociations, Companies, and laboratories annually undertake assessments on pollution response equipment and techniques. These assessments serve the crucial objectives of validating equipment compatibility with end-user specifications, exploring innovations, and addressing gaps in pollution control. The diverse array of tested equipment spans spill surveillance tools (detectors, tracking buoys…), at-sea response mechanisms (recovery chains, dispersion systems, drones…), and shoreline response tools (anchoring, cleanup devices…).
For example, in the framework of the “Evaluation of spill response equipment”, Cedre, which is a French association dedicated to addressing accidental water pollution, identifies and tests new or existing equipment that can fill the gaps or improve anti-pollution response. Engaging in collaboration with Cedre's partners, the selection of devices aligns precisely with their specific needs. Furthermore, equipment manufacturers have the opportunity to enlist Cedre for testing their oil spill response tools or any equipment applicable to oil spill detection or mitigation. Specifically tailored programs for the oil industry encompass comparative testing of various systems leveraging distinct technologies but serving a common purpose: punctual oil detection, identification of pipeline leakages, and multilayer sensors for gravimetric separators…
Three distinct types of tests form the cornerstone of the assessment approach: standardized tests, real-environment implementation tests, and customized tests crafted to address specific requirements. This paper introduces these testing methodologies through three experimental trials: a) standardized oil recovery system test, b) custom-made multilayer detection with probes test, and c) real-environment implementation test for fast current devices.
Conducted under conditions closely mirroring real-life scenarios, these tests empower end-users to make informed selections based on their unique requirements. Simultaneously, equipment manufacturers gain valuable insights into aligning their products with end-users' needs and iteratively enhancing their offerings.
For example, in the framework of the “Evaluation of spill response equipment”, Cedre, which is a French association dedicated to addressing accidental water pollution, identifies and tests new or existing equipment that can fill the gaps or improve anti-pollution response. Engaging in collaboration with Cedre's partners, the selection of devices aligns precisely with their specific needs. Furthermore, equipment manufacturers have the opportunity to enlist Cedre for testing their oil spill response tools or any equipment applicable to oil spill detection or mitigation. Specifically tailored programs for the oil industry encompass comparative testing of various systems leveraging distinct technologies but serving a common purpose: punctual oil detection, identification of pipeline leakages, and multilayer sensors for gravimetric separators…
Three distinct types of tests form the cornerstone of the assessment approach: standardized tests, real-environment implementation tests, and customized tests crafted to address specific requirements. This paper introduces these testing methodologies through three experimental trials: a) standardized oil recovery system test, b) custom-made multilayer detection with probes test, and c) real-environment implementation test for fast current devices.
Conducted under conditions closely mirroring real-life scenarios, these tests empower end-users to make informed selections based on their unique requirements. Simultaneously, equipment manufacturers gain valuable insights into aligning their products with end-users' needs and iteratively enhancing their offerings.
Authors
Engineer. Analysis and Resources Department.
Engineer. Analysis and Resources Department.
Event Type
Paper
TimeTuesday, May 14th3:50pm - 4:10pm CDT
Location298-299
Preparedness